本文摘要：现在pacificrack夏历春节运动，400M内存的cn2 vps仅需要8.88美元年付，简直是史低！买回来可以当传家宝的！你说它不香吗？买回来不仅仅可以搭建自己的小我私家网站，还可以搭建小我私家署理服务，去外洋看看噢~看些嘿嘿嘿的工具嘻嘻嘻~想要知道怎么搭建的朋侪可以用头条搜索：科学上网，即可获知怎么搭建啦。想知道怎么购置吗？

现在pacificrack夏历春节运动，400M内存的cn2 vps仅需要8.88美元年付，简直是史低！买回来可以当传家宝的！你说它不香吗？买回来不仅仅可以搭建自己的小我私家网站，还可以搭建小我私家署理服务，去外洋看看噢~看些嘿嘿嘿的工具嘻嘻嘻~想要知道怎么搭建的朋侪可以用头条搜索：科学上网，即可获知怎么搭建啦。想知道怎么购置吗？会见我的博客：https://www.littlemodesty.com/website-building/vps/pacificrack-vps-test/ 一探究竟噢~评测：一、购入pacificrack 是一家最近才火起来的服务商，听说是国人运营的 quadranet 的子公司(pacificrack 似乎就是 quadranet 的曾用名)。机房在 quadranet 自家的机房里，现在走的是 CN2 GT 线路，如果不翻车的话性价比那是很是高了。

可是这家的口碑比力南北极分化，有的人用起来以为很不错，有的人却连环翻车，开端预计是分到的母鸡差别的锅，真一切全看脸。购置支持使用支付宝付款，博主购置的是7.25美元一年384MB内存的元旦优惠 VPS ，分分钟付款开机。

二、与 Vultr 的对比测试由于 Pacificrack 在面板里最高只有 Debian 9 64位版本可选，所有测试都运行在 Debian 9 情况下。同时，为了控制变量，测试用 Vultr VPS 的位置为美西洛杉矶机房，设置为1H1G。1、服务器性能IO测试第一次：I/O speed(1st run) : 89.4 MB/sI/O speed(2nd run) : 104 MB/sI/O speed(3rd run) : 92.0 MB/sAverage I/O speed : 95.1 MB/s第二次：I/O speed(1st run) : 90.1 MB/sI/O speed(2nd run) : 88.0 MB/sI/O speed(3rd run) : 95.4 MB/sAverage I/O speed : 91.2 MB/s第三次：I/O speed(1st run) : 111 MB/sI/O speed(2nd run) : 112 MB/sI/O speed(3rd run) : 131 MB/sAverage I/O speed : 118.0 MB/sVultrI/O Speed( 1.0GB ) : 356 MB/sI/O Speed( 1.0GB ) : 353 MB/sI/O Speed( 1.0GB ) : 346 MB/sAverage I/O Speed : 351.7 MB/sI/O speed(1st run) : 341 MB/sI/O speed(2nd run) : 351 MB/sI/O speed(3rd run) : 350 MB/sAverage I/O speed : 347.3 MB/s和 Vultr 相比这样的IO结果肯定不算快（究竟人家用的可是 SSD ，但用来建站也差不多够了。UnixBench跑分测试 BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3) System: Csyvps: GNU/Linux OS: GNU/Linux -- 4.9.0-4-amd64 -- #1 SMP Debian 4.9.65-3+deb9u1 (2017-12-23) Machine: x86_64 (unknown) Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8") CPU 0: QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6) (5200.0 bogomips) x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET 01:47:14 up 1:07, 1 user, load average: 0.09, 0.24, 0.30; runlevel 5------------------------------------------------------------------------Benchmark Run: Fri Jan 17 2020 01:47:14 - 02:15:241 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of testsDhrystone 2 using register variables 19399515.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)Double-Precision Whetstone 3052.9 MWIPS (9.6 s, 7 samples)Execl Throughput 2585.2 lps (29.7 s, 2 samples)File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 567586.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 138207.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1135564.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)Pipe Throughput 1376439.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)Pipe-based Context Switching 134205.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)Process Creation 6433.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 4866.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 660.9 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)System Call Overhead 2258575.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEXDhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 19399515.4 1662.3Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3052.9 555.1Execl Throughput 43.0 2585.2 601.2File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 567586.8 1433.3File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 138207.8 835.1File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1135564.2 1957.9Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1376439.2 1106.5Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 134205.9 335.5Process Creation 126.0 6433.5 510.6Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 4866.1 1147.7Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 660.9 1101.6System Call Overhead 15000.0 2258575.5 1505.7 ========System Benchmarks Index Score 938.9VultrBYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3) System: vultr.guest: GNU/Linux OS: GNU/Linux -- 4.9.0-11-amd64 -- #1 SMP Debian 4.9.189-3+deb9u2 (2019-11-11) Machine: x86_64 (unknown) Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8") CPU 0: Virtual CPU 523cbcdd6ca4 (4788.9 bogomips) x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET 09:36:01 up 23 min, 1 user, load average: 0.39, 0.18, 0.11; runlevel 5------------------------------------------------------------------------Benchmark Run: Sat Jan 18 2020 09:36:01 - 10:04:061 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of testsDhrystone 2 using register variables 25349335.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)Double-Precision Whetstone 4294.3 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)Execl Throughput 3378.6 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 382653.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 107060.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1039637.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)Pipe Throughput 561534.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)Pipe-based Context Switching 89520.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)Process Creation 7050.7 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 5807.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 788.3 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)System Call Overhead 329676.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEXDhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 25349335.0 2172.2Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 4294.3 780.8Execl Throughput 43.0 3378.6 785.7File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 382653.0 966.3File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 107060.5 646.9File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1039637.6 1792.5Pipe Throughput 12440.0 561534.3 451.4Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 89520.1 223.8Process Creation 126.0 7050.7 559.6Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 5807.6 1369.7Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 788.3 1313.8System Call Overhead 15000.0 329676.0 219.8 ========System Benchmarks Index Score 753.3令人出乎意料的是，pacificrack 的性能竟然好于 Vultr。

这对于一些比力吃 CPU 的应用可能会有些资助。2、网络性能测试Pacificrack海内： Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency Speedtest.net 405.11 Mbit/s 565.16 Mbit/s 2.951 ms Fast.com 0.00 Mbit/s 130.7 Mbit/s - Beijing 5G CT 2.02 Mbit/s 4.43 Mbit/s - Nanjing 5G CT 3.07 Mbit/s 6.61 Mbit/s - Hefei 5G CT 2.29 Mbit/s 6.84 Mbit/s - Guangzhou 5G CT 6.54 Mbit/s 11.11 Mbit/s - TianJin 5G CU 29.17 Mbit/s 8.29 Mbit/s - Shanghai 5G CU 18.94 Mbit/s 21.42 Mbit/s - Guangzhou 5G CU 58.49 Mbit/s 8.61 Mbit/s - Tianjin 5G CM 3.56 Mbit/s 107.28 Mbit/s - Wuxi 5G CM 2.84 Mbit/s 6.72 Mbit/s - Nanjing 5G CM 0.85 Mbit/s 12.11 Mbit/s - Hefei 5G CM 14.96 Mbit/s 124.84 Mbit/s - Changsha 5G CM 3.59 Mbit/s 24.15 Mbit/s - 外洋：Node Name IPv4 address Download SpeedCacheFly 205.234.175.175 31.4MB/s Linode, Tokyo2, JP 139.162.65.37 9.71MB/s Linode, Singapore, SG 139.162.23.4 5.74MB/s Linode, London, UK 176.58.107.39 8.00MB/s Linode, Frankfurt, DE 139.162.130.8 1.36MB/s Linode, Fremont, CA 50.116.14.9 17.3MB/s Softlayer, Dallas, TX 173.192.68.18 1.05MB/s Softlayer, Seattle, WA 67.228.112.250 981KB/s Softlayer, Frankfurt, DE 159.122.69.4 386KB/s Softlayer, Singapore, SG 119.81.28.170 337KB/s Softlayer, HongKong, CN 119.81.130.170 290KB/s Vultr海内： Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency Speedtest.net 2372.69 Mbit/s 1957.47 Mbit/s 1.263 ms Fast.com 0.00 Mbit/s 151.3 Mbit/s - Beijing 5G CT 8.36 Mbit/s 3.99 Mbit/s - Nanjing 5G CT 67.04 Mbit/s 342.91 Mbit/s - Hefei 5G CT 10.98 Mbit/s 133.37 Mbit/s - Guangzhou 5G CT 1.81 Mbit/s 28.90 Mbit/s - TianJin 5G CU 22.65 Mbit/s 39.31 Mbit/s - Shanghai 5G CU 111.81 Mbit/s 7.82 Mbit/s - Guangzhou 5G CU 97.45 Mbit/s 192.28 Mbit/s - Tianjin 5G CM 0.39 Mbit/s 1.99 Mbit/s - Wuxi 5G CM 4.21 Mbit/s 5.73 Mbit/s - Nanjing 5G CM 1.39 Mbit/s 37.00 Mbit/s - Hefei 5G CM 67.43 Mbit/s 153.11 Mbit/s - Changsha 5G CM 16.73 Mbit/s 177.33 Mbit/s - 外洋：Node Name IPv4 address Download SpeedCacheFly 205.234.175.175 66.1MB/s Linode, Tokyo2, JP 139.162.65.37 17.9MB/s Linode, Singapore, SG 139.162.23.4 13.1MB/s Linode, London, UK 176.58.107.39 13.9MB/s Linode, Frankfurt, DE 139.162.130.8 13.2MB/s Linode, Fremont, CA 50.116.14.9 75.8MB/s Softlayer, Dallas, TX 173.192.68.18 33.8MB/s Softlayer, Seattle, WA 67.228.112.250 39.6MB/s Softlayer, Frankfurt, DE 159.122.69.4 4.88MB/s Softlayer, Singapore, SG 119.81.28.170 7.42MB/s Softlayer, HongKong, CN 119.81.130.170 8.41MB/s 显然，pacificrack 的网速实在是过于缓慢，无论是在海内还是外洋，都被 Vultr 甩了几条街。尤其是对于移动和电信的用户，更是惨不忍睹。

（其时买的时候说是 CN2 VPS，现在看来是一条假 CN2 了。）还想得知更详细信息的朋侪可以会见： pacificrack Vultr，内里有了种种各样的测试效果，包罗网速、路由、Ping 等。

三、总结总的来说，pacificrack 的 VPS 虽然卖的自制，但各项性能都不太好，特别是具有网络毗连缓慢这个致命伤。计划用它来建站的朋侪可得小心了，不外联通用户拿来停飞机倒是一个不错的选择。

列位想要建站的朋侪可以思量 Vultr。新用户用我的 aff 可以获得$100的体验金噢。

链接：https://www.vultr.com/?ref=8379290-6G。

本文关键词：威斯尼斯人官网登录,史上,最,自制,服务器,仅需,8.88,美元,一,年的

本文来源：威斯尼斯人-www.bkhjzl.com